Principle of the dilution refrigerator

As part of my PhD, I’m operating a dilution fridge 24/7. Recently, I found myself explaining to lot of colleagues or friends how it works, so I think a blog post about this may be quite useful.

Good electron transport measurements necessitate low temperature measurements for several reasons:

  • quantum effects do not persist at high temperatures;
  • the Fermi edge is sharp at low temperatures;
  • lattice vibrations (phonons) are much weaker at low temperatures, inducing low electron-phonon interactions.

Ultra low temperatures

To reach and maintain low temperatures, liquid helium inside cryostat have been the mainstream technique. However, it is difficult and expensive to achieve temperatures significantly below 1K only by pumping ⁴He to low pressures. To get to lower temperatures, H. London proposed in 1951 an idea of the ³He/⁴He dilution refrigerator, that has been realised ten years later at Leiden University by H. London, G.R. Clarke and E. Mendoza, and quickly improved by BS. Neganov in Dubna and H.E. Hall at the University of Manchester⁽¹⁾. The mechanism consists in mixing two stable isotopes of helium, that cools down when it separates in two phases.

The phase diagram of ³He/⁴He is shown below:

Phase diagram of ³He/⁴He. Data extracted from ref. 1.

The x-T phase diagram shows different interesting features. Let’s consider pure liquids. Liquid ⁴He becomes superfluid below 2.17K, and pure ³He does not show such a phase transition in the temperature range we can consider for a dilution fridge. We note that ⁴He superfluidity terminates for ³He concentrations higher than 67.5%. At this point, the λ-line meets the phase separation line, below which a forbidden region (two-phases) exits. This means that below this line, the two isotopes are only miscible for some particular concentrations. On the side of this two-phase region, there is a light concentrated phase that is rich in ³He, and a heavy dilute phase, rich in ⁴He. The concentration of the ³He in those two phases depends upon the temperature. Because the enthalpy of ³He in the two phases is different, it is possible to cool down the mixture by evaporating the ³He from the concentrated phase into the dilute phase. We may note on the ⁴He-rich side, that the concentration of the dilute isotope does not rich zero when decreasing the temperature close to 0K. The ³He concentration rather reaches the finite concentration of 6.6%, even for T=0K. This property is of paramount importance for the design of a dilution fridge.

The following figure shows schematics of the ³He/⁴He dilution refrigerator. When the refrigerator is started, the ³He/⁴He mixture is condensed into the dilution unit. This allows the cooling down of the mixture down to 1.2K. The tricritical point is at 0.86K so it is the temperature needed to get phase separation. Hence the still is being cooled down to this point with a ⁴He flow, resulting in cooling down the incoming ³He before it enters the heat exchangers and mixing chamber. This later results in phase separation. Gradually, the rest of the dilution unit is cooled down to the point where the phase separation occurs.

a) Schematic of a dilution refrigerator with four heat exchangers. b) Detail over the ³He-⁴He dilution refrigerator. This part is in a vacuum chamber immersed in a ⁴He bath at 4.2K. The incoming ³He gas is condensed on a continuously operating ⁴He pot at 1.5K. Data extracted from ref. 1.

Operating Principle

In the operating system, the ³He is extracted from the dilute phase, and returned to the concentrated phase, keeping the system in a dynamic equilibrium. This is done by pumping away ³He from the liquid surface in the still, at temperature at which the pressure of ³He is an order of magnitude higher than the one of ⁴He.

As a result the ³He concentration in the dilute phase in the still becomes lower than in the still, that allows the osmotic pressure to drive a flow of ³He to the still.

Wiring and Connections

The device that needs to be cooled down is fixed over the mixing chamber, ensuring a good thermal contact with the dilute phase. All the connections to the room temperature equipment are anchored at different points of the fridge to reduce the heat load on the mixing chamber and limit heat exchanges with outside. Within the cryostat, it is important to minimise the head load. One way to conduct heat within the measured sample is through the wires that are linked to room temperature connections. For this reason, it is needed to chose materials that have a low thermal conductivity. Unfortunately, a good electrical conductivity often comes with a high thermal conductivity, except for superconducting materials that have no electrical resistance and negligible thermal conductivity. For this reason, conventional superconducting wires can be used below 8K to minimise head load on the sample stage.

Other wires can also be used. They are thermally anchored (we call this thermally sunk) to thermalised plates to ensure the wire is at the required temperature.

Limitations

There is no fundamental limitation on how low can a dilution fridge operate. However, most of the commercial refrigerators are limited above 2mK, because both the viscosity and the thermal conductivity of the mixture would increase as the temperature is lowered. To prevent this, the diameter of the tubes should be reduced and their lengths increased. This would make the volume of the fridge increase madly.

References

  1. Pobell F 2007 Matter and Methods at Low Temperatures (Springer)
  2. Hall HE, Ford PJ, and Thomson K 1966 A helium-3 dilution refrigerator Cryogenics. 6 (2): 80–88.

About early career fellowships

As a PhD student at the University of Manchester, I attended this morning a workshop presenting early career fellowships. I’m sharing here some notes about it as it may be valuable to my readers.

The workshop was organised by Dr. Radha Boya, who currently holds a Royal Society Fellowship at UoM. In a first part, different fellowship awardees gave us advice to craft a fellowship application, and this was followed by UoM research support teams presenting the help they can provide. In here, I aim at presenting the main advice from part one presentations.

Fellowships?

In the European research system, tenure-track positions are not common. A few years ago, it used to be possible to get a permanent position directly after a postdoc (or a PhD), but that has never become easier with time. To compensate for this, many funding institutions (ERC, Research Councils UK, European Commission, Wellcome Trust, The Royal Society, The Bill & Melinda Gates foundation, etc.) as well as research Institutes/Universities award early career fellowship for researchers that have enough experience to carry out their own independent research, but lack recognition to secure a permanent position. These institutions usually look for future research leaders with promised world authority on specific topics. The fellowships are usually tenable for 3 to 5 years, after which the fellow ideally obtains a post in the institution in he/she was awarded the fellowship. In this sense, this is comparable to the US tenure track system (with the exception one is not entitled “Assistant Professor” but just “Fellow”).

Applying

During the workshop, some guidance was given by successful fellowship candidates. A common ground for fellowships include a career summary (CV, personal statement, awards, career history, qualifications, list of publications), a research proposal and financial details about the proposed project that aims at selecting candidates for interviews. One of the recurring advice to craft the application was preparation. Before starting to write anything, it has been advice to think about the main idea and the structure of the application package. It has notably said that finding a good idea is almost getting half way. However, the research proposal should show adequacy with the candidate’s background: you may not propose something you’re not familiar with, or would not be able to justify preliminary experience. The personal statement should be oriented the same way. Never forget it is a strictly personal document, that usually writes where the writer’s interest stem from. The workshop panel also highlighted that applicants should feature independent research with a novel and individual idea. In no way this can be an extension of the candidate’s supervisor/P.I. research topics.

Overall, these two documents (along with the curriculum vitæ), should show the panel that the candidate is the best do carry the proposed research from submission date (not five years after the proposal!). It has also been noted that some funding agencies care a lot about hot topics. This does not especially mean that you should select your project depending on what hits the headline of top academic journals, but rather try to uncover and highlight the hidden value of your idea. Thinking about the bigger picture may help: for example highlighting the energy applications of some unknown photo-electric materials may be a hot value you’re not thinking in the first place. It was also reminded that a candidate that loves what he/she does would certainly be more successful that a candidate choosing hot topics to merely be read.

Based on all of this, devising a research proposal can be summarised in addressing the following questions:

  • is the proposed work novel?
  • is the proposed work feasible? i.e. has the applicant done related research before, has he/she a clear plan to achieve it?
  • why does the project matter in the global picture?
  • is the applicant the adequate researcher to carry it out?

Finally, when designing the financial details, it was noted that funding agencies would not select the cheaper projects, but rather based on the envisaged success of the project. Remember that your institution may provide guidance for this part.

What happens after?

The successful applicants would be offered an interviews. Keys for success again includes preparation. The panel told us to get feedbacks from previous colleagues that may be the best to judge our work and ask adequate questions. Having a mock interview organised with researchers outside of your field can also be valuable, as all the judging panel may not directly work in your research area.

If success is not in the cards, remember that the fellowship applications usually have very low success rates (10-15%). This means you should not discount yourself based on first rejections. In this case, you may apply again and again, by always building on feedback from past applications. Don’t be salty about a rejection for a very selective fellowship, but rather try to get feedback that will help you to strengthen future ones.

Would you have other advice for early career researrchers? Let’s discuss this on twitter!